Can You Drink Too Much Green Tea

Green tea is a healthful beverage, rich in antioxidants and nutrients, yet its possible to suffer negative health effects from drinking too much. Heres a look at the chemicals in green tea that can cause harm and how much green tea is too much. Adverse Effects From Chemicals in Green Tea The compounds in green tea responsible for most negative health effects are caffeine, the element fluorine, and flavonoids. The combination of these and other chemicals may cause liver damage in some persons or if you drink a lot of tea. Tannins in green tea reduce the absorption of folic acid, a B vitamin that is particularly important during fetal development. Also, green tea interacts with several medications, so its important to know whether or not you can drink it if you take prescription or over the counter drugs. Caution is advised if you take other stimulants or anticoagulants. Caffeine in Green Tea The amount of caffeine in a cup of green tea depends on the brand and how it is brewed but is around 35 mg per cup. Caffeine is a stimulant, so it increases heart rate and blood pressure, acts as a diuretic, and increases alertness. Too much caffeine, whether from tea, coffee, or another source, can lead to rapid heartbeat, insomnia, and tremors, to stimulant psychosis or even death. Most people can tolerate 200-300 mg of caffeine. According to WebMD, the lethal dose of caffeine for adults is 150-200 mg per kilogram, with serious toxicity possible at lower doses.  Excessive consumption of tea or any caffeinated beverage can be extremely dangerous. Fluorine in Green Tea Tea is naturally high in the element fluorine. Drinking too much green tea can contribute unhealthy levels of fluorine to the diet. The effect is particularly pronounced if the tea is brewed with fluoridated drinking water. Too much fluorine can lead to developmental delays, bone disease, dental fluorosis, and other negative effects.   Flavonoids in Green Tea Flavonoids are potent antioxidants that help protect cells from free radical damage. However, flavonoids also bind nonheme iron. Drinking too much green tea limits the bodys ability to absorb essential iron. This can lead to anemia or a bleeding disorder. According to the Linus Pauling Foundation, routinely drinking green tea with meals can reduce iron absorption by 70%. Drinking tea between meals rather than with food helps to reduce this effect. How Much Green Tea Is Too Much? The answer to this question depends on your personal biochemistry. Most experts advise against drinking more than five cups of green tea per day. Pregnant and nursing women may wish to limit green tea to no more than two cups per day. For most people, the benefits of drinking green tea outweigh the risks, but if you drink too much green tea, are sensitive to caffeine, suffer anemia, or take certain medications, you may experience serious negative health effects. Just as its possible to die from drinking too much water, its possible to drink a lethal volume of green tea. However, caffeine overdose would be the primary risk. References Fluorine Safety References, Purdue University Department of Chemistry (retrieved 03/01/2015)WebMD Green Tea Side Effects (retrieved 03/01/2015)Linus Pauling Foundation, Oregon State University

Essay on Euthanasia in the United States - 1214 Words

Euthanasia in the United States The frail woman lay on her bed, chatting quietly with her grandchild. They had spent the day talking about unicorns, Cinderella, and the olden days. As they conversed, the womans daughter looked on. She nodded to the doctor, and by the end of the evening the joyful spirit of old woman was gone. Euthanasia is a practice that has become more common than realized in the United States. Various states in the Union have tried to legalize euthanasia within the past few years. Those states include Colorado, Florida, Maine, Michigan, New York, Washington, California and Oregon. North Carolina, Utah and Wyoming do not necessarily ban physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia is criminalized in the remaining states†¦show more content†¦A Right to Life lawyer named Annette Patterson said: Its becoming the abortion issue of the next century and just as nasty. Yet it is even more important because how we die concerns everyone (Johnson 31). There is a strong element of truth in this statemen t. Even though a miniscule percentage of people would ever request assistance in dying, to legalize controlled euthanasia would create a wide doorway for open and uncontrolled physician-assisted suicide (Meier 37). Oregons Death with Dignity law, effective since November 4, 1997, did exactly that (Oregon 41). God wants the sanctity of life to be upheld at every cost, no matter the circumstances surrounding the issue. In our modern world, people only think of themselves and their own selfish desires, not necessarily for the good of anothers life. To love someone is to help that person improve the condition of life, not destroy it because it was a personal choice. In Matthew 24:12, it states that And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold (Matthew). America has become as selfish nation that harbors sin, and is therefore looking for a way to eliminate those who need her help the most. The Death with Dignity law is based off Netherlands laws on euthanasia enfo rcement and regulations (Oregon 52). It is now the basis for many stateside proposals, such as Californias, on euthanasia (Johnson 33). It has several requirements, such as a waiting timeShow MoreRelatedEuthanasia in the United States2720 Words   |  11 PagesEuthanasia for the Elderly in the United States Hannah Pate An issue facing much of today’s elderly and terminally ill populations is that of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Several countries, most notably the Netherlands, has legalized euthanasia and physician assisted suicide leading to what is now referred to as â€Å"death tourism†. People from across the world are traveling to place with legalized euthanasia, like the Netherlands, in order to end their lives through assisted suicideRead MoreEuthanasia Is The United States Of America861 Words   |  4 PagesDictionary, euthanasia is ‘the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering.’ Understandably, one suffering from a terminal illness such as AIDS, cancer, or Alzheimer’s, may think it best to put an end to their agony as soon as possible. Although it can be argued that there may be good intentions in carrying out this â€Å"mercy killing†, they do not change the fact that euth anasia is murder and should remain illegal in the United States of AmericaRead MoreA Brief Note On Euthanasia And The United States882 Words   |  4 PagesHistory of Euthanasia in the U.S. Euthanasia is the act or practice, killing of permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy killing. Far more controversial, active euthanasia involves causing the death of a person through a direct action. In response to a request from the person. Euthanasia itself been around for as long as the history of medicine. This euthanasia is enormous and have long history in the United States. This soRead MoreDeath Of The United States Should Legalize Active Voluntary Euthanasia1200 Words   |  5 PagesThe democracy of the United States should legalize active voluntary euthanasia (AVE), active non-voluntary euthanasia (NVAE), and physician-assisted suicide/death (PAS/PAD), in cases where the patient has a terminal illness, unbearable pain, or are in a vegetative state with no chance of being revived. AVE is defined as â€Å"the intentional and painless ‘mercy driven’ termination of a consenting rational person’s life†¦Ã¢â‚¬  NVAE is conjugately defined as â€Å"the termination of an incompetent individual s existenceRead MoreEuthanasia Should Be Legalized And The United States As A Last Resort For The Terminally Ill1760 Words   |  8 Pagesthem, which is considered Euthanasia. The practice of Euthanasia should be legalized and provided in the United States as a last resort for the terminally-ill. Euthanasia debates originate all the way from the perspectives and condemnation by Christians in the Roman Empire. The word euthanasia comes â€Å"from the Greek words eu, meaning good, and thanatos, meaning death† (McDougall 148). The different types of Euthanasia explain the action taking place such as passive Euthanasia, â€Å"to end a person lifeRead MoreShould Euthanasia Be Legalized?1220 Words   |  5 Pagesincurable patients, it is rarely known that Euthanasia, a termination of one’s life with his/her self-willingness, is a release of permanent pain. On the other hand, it is committed by the doctors. Among Voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary Euthanasia, only is Voluntary Euthanasia being universally concerned by human beings. Various fascinating facts, Australia has already approved this act and many people from other countries have also committed Euthanasia. Regarding this topic, people have beenRead MoreShould Euthanasia Be Legalized?907 Words   |  4 Pagesreference for the ethical standards that medical practitioners follow in the United States. One statement seen in the oath is that â€Å"[a physician] will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel†(â€Å"The Hippocratic Oath†), directly refuting the morality of voluntary active euthanasia, which is a highly contentious issue in the United States. Voluntary active euthanasia is currently illegal in the United States. However, I believe that patients with terminal illnesses experiencingRead MoreShould Euthanasia Be Legalized? Essay1200 Words   |  5 Pagesmaintaining existence without regard for its condition is a degradation of the meaning of life, not a promotion of it (Cockeram 33) .† Many adults perceive euthanasia as a murderous act that involves cruel and unusual pain; when in fact, it is usually a method that helps the individual reach their demise in a less miserable manor. Immigrants to the United States are incl ined to become a citizen, not for the beautiful geography, but because the U.S. is one of the few countries that gives everyone freedom establishedRead MoreShould Euthanasia Be Legalized?1039 Words   |  5 Pagesnow, and why is he not offered the option of euthanasia? Because of these reasons: it is illegal in 49 of the states of the United States, except Oregon, since 1828, when the first known anti-euthanasia law was passed in the state of New York. In Oregon, the law states that once a terminally ill adult requests euthanasia, two physicians must agree that the patient is sane and has less than six months to live. Euthanasia is illegal because the United States is based on puritan beliefs that dictate thatRead MoreEuthanasia Is The Painless Killing Of Someone1408 Words   |  6 Pageswithout pain? Euthanasia is the painless killing of someone that is suffering from a disease or something that is incurable. â€Å"The concept of dying with one’s personhood intact is o ften referred to as a â€Å"Socratic death.† In today’s parlance, it is often called â€Å"dying with dignity† (â€Å"Dying with Dignity† 1996; Solovy 1999)† (Patel 38). In Greek, euthanasia literally means a good death. There are also many different versions of euthanasia. The one that is legal in the United States is physician aid

The World’s Surprising Economic Superpower Free Essays

The annual Fortune 500 rankings have become an iconic measure of corporate influence in the U. S. business world. We will write a custom essay sample on The World’s Surprising Economic Superpower or any similar topic only for you Order Now But just as major league baseball’s World Series stacks the deck in favor of U. S. baseball teams, the Fortune 500 is limited to U. S. companies. And just as the United States failed to end up at the top in this year’s (genuinely global) World Baseball Classic, the relative position of U. S. companies changes once you step onto the global playing field. The United States still dominates the Fortune Global 500 with 140 U. S companies, its 30% share equaling roughly the United States’ share of the global economy. That’s twice as many as its nearest competitor, Japan, with 68 companies on the list. But U. S. dominance is clearly eroding. Most notably, a U. S. company is no longer at #1, with Royal Dutch Shell displacing U. S. -based Wal-Mart as the world’s largest company with revenues of $458 billion. That’s the first time a non-U. S. company has been at the head of the list since 1996. The 140 U. S. companies that did make the list combine for the lowest number since Fortune magazine began compiling the list in 1995. Recall that 2008 was particularly unkind to the United States. Within the span of a remarkable 12 months, household names like AIG, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Wachovia, and Washington Mutual all disappeared from the list. The Fortune Global 500: BRICs Rising? The inevitable rise of the BRIC economies — Brazil, Russia, India and China — is now taken as holy writ among the U. S. business press. With the BRIC countries now boasting more than a quarter of the world’s land area and more than 40% of the world’s population, it’s now considered inevitable that, in terms of size, speed, and directional flow, the transfer of global wealth and economic power is shifting from West to East. While it’s true that the BRICs offer some of the best investment opportunities, in terms of companies on the Fortune Global 500, the dominance of the BRICs is still far from today’s reality. The BRICs account for 58 companies among the Fortune Global 500. China stands head and shoulders above its rivals, with 37 companies on the list — a gain of nine companies from only a year ago. India has seven companies on the list, while Brazil has six and Russia has eight among the top 500. As pundit David Rothkopf observed, â€Å"Without China, the BRICs are ust the BRI — a bland, soft cheese that is primarily known for the wine that goes with it. † That said, even the Chinese companies on the list are hardly world beaters. Most are state-owned behemoths — not known for savvy or innovation. China’s second-biggest company is the creatively named â€Å"State Grid,† which ranks (a shocking) #15 in the world. And in 2009, you can still win be ts at almost any U. S. bar by betting someone that she can’t name a Chinese brand. Most of the Chinese companies on the list are like a 7†² 5†³ basketball player who can barely dribble the ball. Sure, it’s hard to ignore that he is an intimidating presence on the basketball court. But that doesn’t mean that you’d want to put him on your All-Star team. And it’s hard not to notice that the largest BRIC companies outside of China are largely based on natural resources — that is, â€Å"trust fund† countries pumping wealth from the ground. Take away the oil and steel industries, and Russia, India and Brazil all suddenly rank alongside Denmark, Austria, Ireland and Finland, with two Fortune Global 500 companies each. In terms of heft, the BRICs are still distinctively minor league. Brazil has one company in the top 100, Russia has two, India has zero, and China has five, totaling eight companies from the BRIC countries in the top 100. By this measure, the combined BRICs beat Britain alone — but not France. The Fortune Global 500: The World’s Surprising Economic Superpower? With all eyes looking toward the inevitable rise of the BRICs, it’s easy to spurn â€Å"Old Europe† as a global economic force. I’m guilty of it and I’ve spent my entire adult life here. There may be a handful of contrarians willing to say that China may not be all that it’s cracked up to be. But in over 15 years of active investment reading, I can recall only a single book that ever viewed Europe’s prospects in a positive light. Taken together, Europe’s economy is not only bigger than the U. S. economy, but its companies also rival the United States for corporate oomph. The economy of Germany, with a population of 80 million people, is the size of China’s, and it both exports more and boasts more companies among the Fortune 500 than its Asian rival (39). Throw in France (40), the United Kingdom (26), Switzerland (15), the Netherlands (12), and Spain (12), and the top six European economies boast an impressive 155 companies among the Fortune Global 500. Not bad for a combined population of 266 million — substantially less than the United States. Include the Scandinavian countries of Sweden, Norway and Denmark (combined population 19 million) landing nine companies on the list, and you skew the list even further in Europe’s favor. And unlike the BRICs, the European companies are distinctly top-heavy. Germany has 15 companies in the top 100, France, 10; Britain, six; Italy, five; Spain, three; and Netherlands, two, for a total of 41. That far outpaces the United States’ collective 27 companies on the list of the world’s 100 largest. The Fortune Global 500: A Welcome Correction Parsing the Fortune Global 500 rankings offers an important correction to what you hear in the mainstream business press. First, on a country level, U. S companies still dominate the global economy. And Japan, for all of its widely publicized problems, is still a powerful economic force. Second, China plays a much smaller role in the real world than it does in your email inbox. Third, and perhaps most surprisingly, taken together, the European companies outrank the United States — both in the top 100 and top 500 of the Fortune Global 500. Think of Europe as a single country and you suddenly realize that it trounced both the United States and China in the Beijing Olympics. And it wasn’t even close. Yet, consider how likely it would be that you’d ever subscribe to an investment newsletter that focused solely on investment opportunities in Europe. The broader lesson is that distinctions on national lines are increasingly irrelevant. A good example is Arcelor Mittal, the world’s largest steel-maker, which grew its revenues faster than Google did over the past five years. Arcelor Mittal is technically a Luxembourg-based company, run by an Indian, who lives in London. And I’d be surprised if you even knew (or cared) that the world’s #1 company, Royal Dutch Shell, is actually based in the Netherlands. For true multinationals, country of origin is so yesterday. And that’s the way it should be for you in looking at your investments. How to cite The World’s Surprising Economic Superpower, Papers

Successful Life free essay sample

Being 16 in todays world is a whole lot harder than it probably was 10 or so years ago because many teens struggle with academics or a social life. Life can be like a rainbow you can live a successful life with a pot of gold, a house, cars, and fancy clothing, or you can live life at the other side of the rainbow at the bottom visualizing a fantasy. Personally, I dont measure success by the money; I measure it as to how I have gotten to reach success and the quality of the success. The majority of people who have reached success dont realize that there is more to success than money. For example, the journey to reach success matters the most because you meet people and experience things that mold you into someone with character. My Grandfather is a perfect example of success, because although he has Alzheimers he doesnt let that stop him from bringing joy and positivity to those around him. We will write a custom essay sample on Successful Life or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Every time Im with him I can tell hes happy even though hes not rich because he doesnt measure success by money he has showed me that character is what makes the person successful. Nowadays character cannot really be found in people who have reached success , because they are so overwhelmed with money that they forget who they are on the inside. You can tell the difference between people who have character than the ones who dont because people with character tend to stay true to their roots and they are the kind of people who stay humble even with the money. The experiences along the road to success are something else that I take into account when I measure success. People in our society right now prefer to measure the success of life by how long you live and the money instead people should measure life by the quality of those years and how good those years were. You can play it safe, live to 100 plus years and do nothing your whole life and then what? Do you feel accomplished? Do you feel successful? The experiences along the way the road to success make the success seem rewarding in the end , because after facing all the noise and adversity you finally reach your goal all the success actually feels rewarding because of the experiences. Success cannot be measured by money because you are the judge of your own success and how you have reached success and the quality of the success determines whether you are successful or not. In 30 years I will look back on my life and I will ask myself a question that experiences, people, and character are take into consideration.